Closed deadlocklogic closed 1 year ago
At the moment, this is the way to handle it, yes. It is clunky, and it would be nice if there was a relationship I could automatically build here, but unfortunately the way this work is that each of those types are entirely different even though they're visually / lexically "related" by one being nested in another.
Code:
Binding:
This works thought but the indirection feels smelly, is there a cleaner way to do so? Thanks.