Closed MNThomson closed 10 months ago
@MNThomson is this sufficient to show intent to license as MIT?
A real license file might be more explicit, but the MIT license is fairly well defined/understood :)
Wow.....I'm an idot. I'm going to add a LICENSE
file just to be explicit, thx @DanInProgress!
This repository and its code is currently unlicensed. So as explained by ChooseALicense:
@ThePrimeagen can we get this repo licensed? Preferably MIT or ISC for complete access for all. Thoughts?