Closed GFORW closed 1 year ago
it's a valid question. in theory ==
is sufficient, but >=
is more defensive. if for whatever reason the iterator skips from <= end()
to >= end()
then the ==
results in an infinite loop (well, until after size_t
overflows). it "can't" happen here. until it does....
~~ Hi, whats up with that
Iterator>=container.end()
stuff, why check for>=
, it is not supposed to work like pointers, it just gives you std::end, if you iterated to the ater the end or in case of not finding value by comparator, as i undestand, please correct me if i am wrong. (source)~~ nvm i am blind