Open jdickey opened 8 years ago
As of Commit c3f0101, ten files (9 under lib and 1 under test) have FIXME notes. These are:
lib
test
FIXME
lib/prolog/entities/article_ident_v.rb
lib/prolog/use_cases/propose_edit_contribution/update_article_with_marked_body.rb
lib/prolog/use_cases/propose_edit_contribution/validate_attributes.rb
lib/prolog/use_cases/propose_edit_contribution.rb
lib/prolog/use_cases/publish_new_article/form_object.rb
lib/prolog/use_cases/publish_new_article.rb
lib/prolog/use_cases/respond_to_single_proposal/result.rb
lib/prolog/use_cases/respond_to_single_proposal.rb
lib/prolog/use_cases/retrieve_article/form_object.rb
test/prolog/use_cases/register_new_member/form_object_test.rb
These should be relatively easy to fix, piecemeal, as the opportunity arises. Many, but not all, are Reek complaints about "too many instance variables/methods", strongly implying an SRP violation baked into how i think about that particular class.
As of Commit c3f0101, ten files (9 under
lib
and 1 undertest
) haveFIXME
notes. These are:lib/prolog/entities/article_ident_v.rb
line 9;lib/prolog/use_cases/propose_edit_contribution/update_article_with_marked_body.rb
lines 41-42;lib/prolog/use_cases/propose_edit_contribution/validate_attributes.rb
lines 14-17;lib/prolog/use_cases/propose_edit_contribution.rb
lines 25-27;lib/prolog/use_cases/publish_new_article/form_object.rb
line 11;lib/prolog/use_cases/publish_new_article.rb
line 10;lib/prolog/use_cases/respond_to_single_proposal/result.rb
line 12;lib/prolog/use_cases/respond_to_single_proposal.rb
lines 13-17;lib/prolog/use_cases/retrieve_article/form_object.rb
line 25;test/prolog/use_cases/register_new_member/form_object_test.rb
lines 35-39.These should be relatively easy to fix, piecemeal, as the opportunity arises. Many, but not all, are Reek complaints about "too many instance variables/methods", strongly implying an SRP violation baked into how i think about that particular class.