search

TheSpaghettiDetective / obico-server

Obico is a community-built, open-source smart 3D printing platform used by makers, enthusiasts, and tinkerers around the world.
https://obico.io
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
1.47k stars 297 forks source link

Making dataset available #310

Closed hbrylkowski closed 2 years ago

hbrylkowski commented 3 years ago

Hi,

I would want to try and train my own models, however I couldn't find the dataset that you are using. I've only found link in this issue - https://github.com/TheSpaghettiDetective/TheSpaghettiDetective/issues/21 to google drive - would it be ok if I just request for access to said gdrive?

kennethjiang commented 3 years ago

Reactivated the link.

Please let me know if you can access it so that I can close this issue.

CoderChen01 commented 3 years ago

Reactivated the link.

Please let me know if you can access it so that I can close this issue.

Hi, How do I label the target box for this data set, in other words, how to put the target box on the spaghetti to make the model work best, like this?

CoderChen01 commented 3 years ago

Reactivated the link.

Please let me know if you can access it so that I can close this issue.

MY IDEA my idea

kennethjiang commented 3 years ago

There are many different image labeling tools you can use. We use https://github.com/puzzledqs/BBox-Label-Tool internally. It's probably not the best but it's free. :)

CoderChen01 commented 3 years ago

There are many different image labeling tools you can use. We use https://github.com/puzzledqs/BBox-Label-Tool internally. It's probably not the best but it's free. :)

Ok thanks for your reply, I use https://github.com/tzutalin/labelImg , but you seem to have misunderstood my question and my question is how do you label your dataset to make the model work best like multiple target boxes on the spaghetti or on big target box on the whole spaghetti. as follows

This is my old work

old work

This is my new idea

old work

Please guide me. Thank you very much

hbrylkowski commented 3 years ago

Thanks @kennethjiang got it, are there labels, or if I would want to try my approach I should label them myself?

kennethjiang commented 3 years ago

Good question. Our way of labelling the images has evolved, from the one closer to your first approach to the ones close to to your 2nd lol. But it's been hard for us to go back to relabel images every time we adjust our way, so there is some (significant) inconsistency in our labels.

CoderChen01 commented 3 years ago

Good question. Our way of labelling the images has evolved, from the one closer to your first approach to the ones close to to your 2nd lol. But it's been hard for us to go back to relabel images every time we adjust our way, so there is some (significant) inconsistency in our labels.

Thanks for you beyond words! I think the second method is better than the first one. What do you think?

kennethjiang commented 3 years ago

That's what our intuition told us too. Interestingly enough, we didn't see as significant improvement as we hoped after switching to the new way of labelling the images. We are still not sure the shortfall in accuracy improvement was because Yolo is not very sensitive to how the data is labelled, or due to the fact that our training data is a mix of both labelling approaches (actually more as we evolved it).

CoderChen01 commented 3 years ago

That's what our intuition told us too. Interestingly enough, we didn't see as significant improvement as we hoped after switching to the new way of labelling the images. We are still not sure the shortfall in accuracy improvement was because Yolo is not very sensitive to how the data is labelled, or due to the fact that our training data is a mix of both labelling approaches (actually more as we evolved it).

OK, thank you. Thank you so much. Best wishes to Thespaghetdetective