Closed mcserved closed 2 years ago
This are a brief summary of the things that we need to do before the GNSE is ready to be a capable temperature sensor for industry use. Note that all tests are listed in chapter 6. I'll continue updating this list, and will include a separate checklist for all specific tests as these are a bit more specific (and way longer).
@wienke how should we move forward with this? Update the missing parts and continue, wait it out, etc.?
Let's focus on the basic app right now and put this to the backlog.
@marnixcro could you please provide a small report on the progress done on this issue from your side.
The report should be:
This issue has been mentioned on Discuss The Things Industries. There might be relevant details there:
https://discuss.thethingsindustries.com/t/generic-node-temperature-certification/685/1
This issue was moved to our discuss.
Summary:
The GNSE might have a use case for the food industry, as a temperature sensor for storage of food in transport, storage and distribution of food. To make it applicable for such a use case, certain reguluations, the NEN norm, has to be passed for it to apply.
Why do we need this?
For use cases of the GNSE in the food storage industry.
What is already there? What do you see now?
GNSE already has temperature sensors, OTA communication (with future FUOTA support), feedback with LEDs and buzzer, etc.. This can already be a start to test certain certifications.
What is missing? What do you want to see?
A clear understanding if the GNSE could be used in these use cases, or if it could pass with minor changes to the design.
How do you propose to implement this?
Use the NEN-certification and see if the GNSE could pass these, or if it could pass with only minor design changes.
Environment:
GNSE
Acceptance Criteria:
The GNSE could pass certification (maybe with minor design changes) or it could certainly not pass the certification.
What can you do yourself and what do you need help with?
All