Open DavidHaslam opened 6 years ago
The use of soft hyphens can become ridiculous!
<verse osisID="Gen.4.4" sID="Gen.4.4"/> while Abel brought some of the firstborn from his flock, that is, some fat slices
from them. The Eternal favoured Abel and his pres-
<milestone type="column" n="2"/>
ent;
<verse eID="Gen.4.4"/>
Here the word present
is split by a column break, but contains a hyphen as well as a soft hyphen where the word is split.
In this example, the words firstborn
and Eternal
also contain a soft hyphen.
NB. GitHub hides these!
cf. In Exodus, the word firstborn
is found both with and without a soft hyphen, and more often with an ordinary hyphen!
Such inconsistencies need to be resolved.
See also #9
Most of the soft hyphens were found in the existing XML files,
but there were also 129 soft hyphens in 1 Chronicles.usfm
I've just removed them from the USFM file in my branch.
NB. Multiple (ordinary) hyphens should be systematically replaced by the horizontal bar.
There are lots of hyphenated words in Moffatt, but many transcribed words have spurious soft hyphens.
I suspect that these are the result of having used "soft hyphens" in case of word-wrap at the end of text lines in the original.
Aside: Are any of these are an artefact of having used LibreOffice ?
Soft hyphens are rarely applied uniformly by typesetters. Rather they are ad hoc expedients applied at specific locations where they seem to have been needed.
For an electronic edition, I recommend the removal of all soft hyphens.
NB. They play havoc with exact searches in Bible sofware.