Closed ThomUK closed 11 months ago
It all looks really good to me Tom. I checked out the branch locally and looked through the main R files. I didn't look at the tests or the example data, but all the package checks pass.
Tests generate a few warnings to do with using the variable reference style .data$var
instead of .data[["var"]]
in process_event_data_t
. I could edit that file at a later date maybe.
Great to have got to this point and tidied up the various WIP branches into a single dev state that can be merged to main 🥂🍾 You've also resolved a few of the lingering questions about package design and what should live where.
Will also close my edits for #89 .
Please complete the following information:
1) A reference to the issue addressed by this pull-request:
closes #82 closes #75 also does enabling work for #28, but does not complete it
2) A description of the changes proposed in this PR:
3) Add @mentions for the people who will review this PR:
@francisbarton
Please confirm that you have:
devtools::test()
and fixed all failing tests and warnings.suppressMessages()
to any test message which breaks the test progress UI.Thank you for contributing to {SPCreporter}!!