Closed shuqike closed 1 month ago
@shuqike you are right that actually no need to -1. This is a very old bug thomas made long time ago and we didn't want to fix. Because this only affects the approximation. I am referring to AppendixB in Lashkari et al., NeuroImage 2010 (Discovering structure in the space of fMRI selectivity profiles). We are using the upper bound as the final approximation. However, using D-1 rather than D still holds the approximation (Equation B.7). It's just that it's no longer the upper bound. We don't want to fix it because it will affect the replication of some old scripts. And since it doesn't really affect the performance, we decide to keep it to D-1.
I see. Thanks for quick response!
Expected situation
According to the paper "Clustering on the Unit Hypersphere using von Mises-Fisher Distributions" by Arindam Banerjee et al., the normalizing constant of a von Mises-Fisher distribution is given by
$$ cd(\kappa)=\frac{\kappa^{d/2-1}}{(2\pi)^{d/2}I{d/2-1}(\kappa)} $$
where $d$ is the dimension of a feature vector.
Actual situation
However, in the code CBIG_VonmisesSeriesClustering_fix_bessel_randnum_bsxfun.m line 129:
tic, clustered = direcClus_fix_bessel_bsxfun(series, num_clusters, size(series, 2) - 1, num_tries, lambda, 0, 0, 1e-4, 1, max_iter, 1);
you passedsize(series, 2) - 1
into thedirecClus_fix_bessel_bsxfun
function. Is this equivalent to $c_{d-1}(\kappa)$?In this case, should we use
size(series, 2)
without minus 1 instead?Thanks!