Open alexanderson1993 opened 2 years ago
This might be a really "dumb" question but, what would you consider a feature? Is a feature basically the different items you can choose to install when setting up thorium?
Not a dumb question - I asked it myself
Like, what even counts as a feature?
I don't have an answer really. I suppose at its broadest, a feature is anything that we change in the behavior of Thorium Nova that causes a user to go "Hey, wait. I liked it the way it was before better. Change it back!"
As far as potential features that not everyone who downloads thorium might want (or might change the way thorium feels/functions), I can see the following:
I can see some people maybe wanting to install a "lite" version of thorium that only includes the bare minimum to run on "wimpier" pcs.
I'm not sure as to complexity vs added value for any of these items being features but they are what I came up with at first thought as being potential "features".
That's a good list. Many of them are configurable as plugins, like extra themes and assets, but some of them are definitely deeply integrated and would need something special to toggle on and off.
I don't know how hard it would be to do this kind of stunt. But what if everything is a plugin. Like a flight behavior plugin for a ship, or a different view screen plugin. This way by disabling the plugin itself you could implement a feature flag system. But I simply do not know enough about your plugin system to be certain if it's possible or if it would just throw out more issues than by just implementing some simple configuration feature flags.
Plugins are just content packs. I would call any external package that adds code a "mod" and we decided in this discussion https://github.com/Thorium-Sim/thorium-nova/discussions/32#discussioncomment-1510208 that mods are a no-go. We'll expect people to just add code to the core. The feature flag discussion actually started in that discussion anyway.
Mods would add a ton of complexity and difficulty, especially when it comes to adding in new UI to the frontend. It's easier on developers to just build it in directly.
The current plugin system I think answers this question.
As it stands, we are putting in what is necessary to run it, then different content packs people can add as plugins all they want.
It may be worth it to come back to this once we are closer to a more feature filled system to see what can be classified as "absolutely necessary" and "Optional that some people will pass on."
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some crews and flight directors might not want to use all of the features. Maybe there should be some way of adding feature flags of sorts.
Describe the solution you'd like
I have no idea. Suggestions welcome. This won't be marked as approved until we have a good plan for moving forward.
Like, what even counts as a feature?
Additional context
This would be especially helpful for a few reasons
This also might be a bad idea - too much complexity, not a whole lot of value. I might just reject this idea anyway, but I want to hear if anyone has any other ideas.