Closed ks1990cn closed 1 year ago
@ks1990cn
Can we discuss on https://github.com/ThreeMammals/Ocelot/issues/1093 with this proposed solution?
Sure! I propose to remove Polly from Ocelot at all!... Because Polly is a constant source of issue/bugs being reported in our backlog.
Dear Tanmay, Make it ready for review! Could you resolve all merge conflicts please?
Dear Tanmay, Make it ready for review! Could you resolve all merge conflicts please?
But I thought you guys are going to remove Polly. do I still need to resolve, cause its incomplete PR just had suggestion on it.
But I thought you guys are going to remove Polly.
Not now. It was a joke! 🤣 Polly removal is not discussed at the moment. It is just my idea to have less dev pain in the neck... At least next 2 major Ocelot releases will have Polly lib being referenced definitely...
Closes #1093
1093
This is proposed solution to add WaitAndRetry mechanism of Polly, which is currently not part of Polly (QoS).
This is not proper solution, this just I am trying to understand high level changes we need to add WaitAndRetry. I have not done any refactoring.
Proposed Changes
Test cases and need to clean this code.
@ggnaegi @raman-m Can we discuss on https://github.com/ThreeMammals/Ocelot/issues/1093 with this proposed solution? I am unable to dedicate much time on learning Ocelot. But I think we have to think on above points.