Remove the `Newtonsoft.Json` package and migrate to `System.Text.Json`

[EngRajabi]

In this request, we deleted the newtonsoft package and migrated to text json system. The reason for the changes

• Newtonsoft package is no longer developed
• System text json package was developed by Microsoft itself and has many changes and improvements day by day
• System text json has a much better performance
• It consumes much less RAM The changes given include the removal of Newtonsoft. A benchmark has also been added for this

@MohammadAminPourmoradian helped me with this

BenchmarkDotNet v0.13.11, Windows 11 (10.0.22631.3880/23H2/2023Update/SunValley3) Intel Core i7-10870H CPU 2.20GHz, 1 CPU, 16 logical and 8 physical cores .NET SDK 8.0.303 [Host] : .NET 6.0.32 (6.0.3224.31407), X64 RyuJIT AVX2 [AttachedDebugger] .NET 8.0 : .NET 8.0.7 (8.0.724.31311), X64 RyuJIT AVX2

Job=.NET 8.0 Runtime=.NET 8.0

Method	Count	Mean	Error	StdDev	Median	Op/s	Gen0	Gen1	Gen2	Allocated
MicrosoftDeserializeBigData	1000	856.3 us	53.98 us	157.47 us	797.1 us	1,167.8	39.0625	13.6719	-	328.78 KB
NewtonsoftDeserializeBigData	1000	1,137.2 us	18.74 us	17.53 us	1,132.8 us	879.4	54.6875	17.5781	-	457.94 KB
MicrosoftSerializeBigData	1000	646.4 us	12.72 us	20.90 us	645.7 us	1,546.9	110.3516	110.3516	110.3516	350.02 KB
NewtonsoftSerializeBigData	1000	1,033.4 us	19.37 us	42.53 us	1,022.8 us	967.7	109.3750	109.3750	109.3750	837.82 KB

[raman-m]

build - Skipped This is very strange... We need to fix the PR build

[raman-m]

Mohsen, if you don't mind, I will rebase the branch once again... I hope to fix the build.

[raman-m]

build - Success

Very well❕

[raman-m]

@EngRajabi @MohammadAminPourmoradian Mohsen and Mohammad, congratulations! The PR has entered the official code review stage. The build is green and stable now. I've made some on-the-fly code review adjustments, including superficial changes. The pull request is now well-prepared for an easy review. Could you consider working on the suggestions from my code review plz?

@ggnaegi @RaynaldM Hello, I anticipate your thorough code review due to the significant and important upgrade in the Core involving the replacement of the JSON parsing library. I would value your consideration of my proposal to redesign the current draft solution, as I foresee potential issues.

[EngRajabi]

@raman-m requested changes on Jul 22, 2024

You gave a good suggestion, but is it really that much work? Microsoft package system text json is executed on net 6 7 8. Old versions are not affected because json behavior has not changed. It can be done by separating a serializer layer, but is it really necessary? How often does it change?

[ggnaegi]

@raman-m let's check this...