Recently the DQT started to trigger an Additional Check warning for no geodata being present when geodata is present.
The behaviour is if Recipient Org:Location: Geographic Code and Recipient Org:Location: Location Name are present by Recipient Org:Location:Geographic Code Type is missing the test is triggered.
The same happens with the equivalent beneficiary location fields. This is already confusing publishers who are used to their data passing these checks (and working in our tools).
In the past we discussed these checks and what to do about missing geocode type see 1070 but agreed that geocode type would not be included in the - is there geodata check and to flag issues another way. Therefore I think this is a bug that needs to be amended.
Recently the DQT started to trigger an Additional Check warning for no geodata being present when geodata is present.
The behaviour is if Recipient Org:Location: Geographic Code and Recipient Org:Location: Location Name are present by Recipient Org:Location:Geographic Code Type is missing the test is triggered.
The same happens with the equivalent beneficiary location fields. This is already confusing publishers who are used to their data passing these checks (and working in our tools).
In the past we discussed these checks and what to do about missing geocode type see 1070 but agreed that geocode type would not be included in the - is there geodata check and to flag issues another way. Therefore I think this is a bug that needs to be amended.