Open FND opened 11 years ago
There have been some discussions in the google group if TwitterCards or "Facebook social graph" or "dublin core" tags should be part of the tiddler hmtl presentation.
Since we have the possibility now, imo the default representation should have the bare minimum, to be usefull.
There can / should be themes, that implement eiter FB or TC or dc ... so the user can decide.
I guess we all agree that minimalism is desirable. We still want the HTML to be semantic though - and that goes beyond choosing appropriate tag names.
Things like TwitterCards are (AIUI) primarily presentational, so that's of no concern here. As for Dublin Core, well, that's debatable, but I think this community tends to prefer such information in the HTML body instead.
Which of the several places in various pages where modifier/creator show up should this be used? Everywhere it is a link?
And how should it be structured.
For example we currently have in friendlytiddler.html
:
<p class="user modifier">By <a href="{{ modifier_link }}">{{ tiddler.modifier|e }}</a></p>
The standard form in hcard is:
<span class="vcard">
<span class="fn nickname">daveman692</span>
</span>
In h-card it is (in the most simple form):
<a class="h-card" href="http://example.com">Joe Bloggs</a>
Not sure which is more accepted (which is part of why I wonder about using these things at all...) but it looks like the indieweb crowd is getting behind h-card.
Which of the several places in various pages where modifier/creator show up should this be used? Everywhere it is a link?
That sounds reasonable.
As for hCard vs. h-card, seems like the latter is a simplified, modern version - so if you're right about the indieweb crowd (like who?) adopting that, we should join in.
see http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard
should probably link to the modifier's home space