I wonder if InstanceConsumer.consumeAll shouldn't be named
consumeSequence. ClassifierAnnotator.consumeAll simply delegates to its
classifiers classifySequence method. I ask because I am writing up a
description of what FeatureOutcomeExtractors are for. I need a working
definition of what it means to be performing a sequential tagging task -
which for me is when your annotation handler calls consumeAll. It seems
strange not to call this method consumeSequence. Was this a deliberate
decision - or an oversight?
Agree. I don't remember having a good reason for going with consumeAll --
other than we had been naming things all day and were probably getting
worse and worse at it :)
consumeSequence makes more sense.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by pvogren@gmail.com on 6 Mar 2009 at 4:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pvogren@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2009 at 4:58