Open maggaou opened 2 years ago
It's intentionally missing for this reason: If you made a lot of fast goals, with a large standard deviation, but then in the next round shoot only slow goals, with a small standard deviation, did you really improve? I believe a difference for standard deviation would be misleading. Now that I think about it, I could try and add a "neutral" color though, so display the difference, but do not judge if it's an improvement or not
In my experience std dev and mean are correlated. I believe that is the case in most of the time. I think that in general low std dev reflects intention rather than pure chance.
I'm willing to analyze your data if you have collected enough data points. I have only collected data from certain training packs meaning that training using other packs can produce different results.