Closed FlyingLotus1983 closed 9 years ago
As a temporary (or even permanent, phase 1) solution we could use: http://www.robotdigg.com/product/517/Nozzle+w/+Adapter+to+5mm+Hollow+Shaft+Stepper
We have a finite amount of engineering resources at the moment and I wonder if bespoking a solution for this part is the best use of our time. I'd like to find something off the shelf if possible.
Does the robotdigg part count as OTS?
Yes, that would count as off-the-shelf. However, the RobotDigg shaft adapter uses a set-screw, so it's permanently mounted. If we want to be able to switch between paste application and PnP with our current head, then we'll need an o-ring setup at the least. We've done this type of thing before and would be extremely easy to make an 8mm to 5mm shaft with an o-ring on the nozzle end... that's perfectly within our engineering bandwidth right now.
The only other thing that worries me about the Juki nozzles is the spring-loaded end. While great for placing SMT parts gently, it wasn't what I had mind for Z probing. My idea was to use a fixed (non-spring) nozzle and use the back-EMF sensing. If we can figure out Z probing some other way, then I'm otherwise fine with the Juki nozzle but @itsmefelix- we are going to need a good reliable source of not only the nozzles, but also the shaft adapters. This means that we need to be able to order nozzles with an exact orifice size and other characteristics, for example, 0.8mm, if we get something else or a mixture of different types, that's going to get the pressure sensing all out of whack, since vacuum/pressure measured is influenced by orifice size. Have you already looked into finding a particular reputable vendor and asking them if they're able to meet our needs?
Switching between paste application and PnP? Paste application doesn't require the nema motor. Why would that not work?
@FlyingLotus1983 The spring loaded end should easily provide enough push back to sense with back EMF. The springs are pretty strong. If we can't sense that we'll need to reconsider back EMF anyway, because that much pressure to trigger it will cause mechanical flexing in the machine.
@WillD77 we need to be able to quickly remove the nozzle to switch to paste application. If the nozzle is mounted with a set screw this is less convenient for the user.
I know another issue is the length of the adapter and the actual nozzle, which when combined will be much lower to the bed plate than our current configuration, but maybe we can try other off the shelf nozzles as well.
It's only 7mm longer.
Adapter has been shown to work as proof of concept. Will test with O-rings as soon as we receive them. We might need to use a set screw to hold the adapter to the NEMA motor.
The prototype will have a set screw. I'm closing this issue for now, but I've opened an issue here: https://github.com/TinWhiskers/fpd-design/issues/65 for upgrading this design to a quick-change using o-rings, ball bearings, springs, or something to that effect.
Need to quickly make a call whether to:
Either of these choices, ideally, would have the ability to perform auto-nozzle changes.