Closed LuciaSegovia closed 11 months ago
I think it's better to take this into a separate thread, as the other should be for new functions ideas 😅
Yeah, definitely haha :)
Hi @LuciaSegovia - This should now be fixed :) The bug was that any errors were being attributed to the first group ID on the list (1001 in this case), but the error message was caused by a different group (1002) for a legitimate reason - the weightings total ~ 0.75 :)
Please can you reinstall and make sure thats now working for you? :)
Thank you @TomCodd ! It run perfectly on my side :) . Although I found another issue. See in the picture attached, that the id is missing in the summary row. I think this will cause problems down the line.
Hi @LuciaSegovia !
Hmmm - missing the item_desc you mean?
Sorry @TomCodd! What I meant is if you check row 5 and row 7, it should say "SUMMARY ROW - 1002" and "SUMMARY ROW - 1004" respectively, instead of "SUMMARY ROW - NA".
Thats ok @LuciaSegovia !
Ah, ok - I see what you mean. I'll look into it now :) Theres also the row order I want to double check. Did you make any other changes to that dataset since you sent it to me, aside from adding pork lard?
Thank you @TomCodd!
I am doing some changes to the dataset, but they should be irrelevant to the summariser.
No problem @LuciaSegovia , thank you for finding them!
I've solved that problem - give it a minute for the website to update and please could you try installing the package again, and see if its working for you too? :)
@TomCodd it's not working for me :(
@LuciaSegovia :(
Apparently the push didn't work lol - sorry! Give it a minute or two, reinstall and try again? :)
Thank you @TomCodd !! It's working!! YAY!
@LuciaSegovia Glad its working!! :)
Sorry, thats definitely a problem - can you send me the dataset you were trying it with (i.e. save it as an R data file just before it was input into the Summariser) , and the group summariser command you were running? I'll see if I can sort it :)
Originally posted by @TomCodd in https://github.com/TomCodd/NutritionTools/issues/2#issuecomment-1827595435