Bug: Unfulfilled User Stories in DG

[TomLBZ]

These 2 functions are not implemented in the jar. At least I did not find them by looking through the UG.

1. The program does not visualize modules in therecommended schedule. It does not even have a recommended schedule.
2. I cannot find my completed modules for a semester. I cannot even complete anything

[nus-pe-bot]

Team's Response

For point 1, there is a misunderstanding as this app is supposed to help you craft your own recommended schedule and visualise it by going to acadplan and view then full, which will make you view the full calendar of yours.

For point 2, simply enter PlanNUS, into acadplan and view and type in the semester you wish to visualise.

Hence this is a documentation bug of low severity(due to misundertanding in point 1).

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue severity

Team chose [severity.Low] Originally [severity.High]

• [x] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: According to the severity types:

severity.VeryLow : A flaw that is purely cosmetic and does not affect usage e.g., a typo/spacing/layout/color/font issues in the docs or the UI that doesn't affect usage.
severity.Low : A flaw that is unlikely to affect normal operations of the product. Appears only in very rare situations and causes a minor inconvenience only.
severity.Medium : A flaw that causes occasional inconvenience to some users but they can continue to use the product.
severity.High : A flaw that affects most users and causes major problems for users. i.e., makes the product almost unusable for most users.

Point 1:

• The documentation is highly misleading. It claims that the program visualizes modules in the recommended schedule,
  but the program does not recommend any schedule to the user, it only visualises user's own chosen schedules.
  Thus, the statement in the document is an untruthful representation of the actual functionality, and it is likely to affect most users
  and cause major problems (the user will have a wrong perception of the purpose of the program).
  Therefore, it cannot be of a Low severity. I would argue that it should be of a High or at least Medium severity instead.

Point 2:

• The team's response does not address the point (Point 2) at all. Using their provided method in the response:
  For point 2, simply enter PlanNUS, into acadplan and view and type in the semester you wish to visualise.
  Following their response, there is still no way in the program to differentiate completed modules from ongoing ones or perspective ones.
  This is also a false declarication of the functionality of the program.
  The document claims that the program can find completed modules for a semester, while the program cannot.
  In fact, the program can only show all modules added to that semester, but cannot find any completed module.

Therefore, since the document untruthfully states the functionalities of the program in a misleading way that is likely to cause confusion and affect most users,
especially on the first few usages, the severity should not be Low. It should be High instead because those false functionalities in the documents that were
never implemented are likely to affect most users. As a concession, condering that the confusion and inconvenience will fade away once the user become
accostumed to the program's actual functionalities, a Medium is also suitable, but Low is definitely an understatement of the severity.

---