Open hassaniazi opened 1 week ago
Hi. Thanks for reviewing.
RE the first issue, we discussed this as part of #72. The TLDR is that the current license structure in the package is consistent with the recommended approach for R packages. It's not ideal, I know, but it's an artifact of CRAN policies.
For the second issue, I'm seeing that I don't have community guidelines but the rest is there. Does that reflect what you are asking for?
Added contribution guideline and code of conduct here: 1db7a975957d390ba2f3ce96c5f2882564aace26
I'll close this issue upon confirmation that this was the only documentation issue or when I know what other issues need addressing.
Hi, great job on developing this package. I will post detailed comments on the paper later. For now, I have two minor requests: