Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Not bad. A very interesting idea.
It need a large library of poses, but I like it.
Thanks!
Original comment by mbasti...@gmail.com
on 30 May 2011 at 9:53
You have 2 options for this feature:
* a large library of installation (a very large then!)
* reasoning algorithm that I call "inference by the retrospective space"
What is it?
you start by deducing the position of the hips. IF your red dots allow two
spatial possibilities, then the two possibilities are registered (the software
will choose one at random). Then you place the red dot below (eg, knees)
the two possibilities may occur:
1 - from the position of the hip, knee position is possible. is validated
2 - from the position of the hip, knee position is impossible.
If you are in the second case, then the software will "backfire" on the hip,
remember the alternative space and use it. Then, the knee will be good from the
hip.
If, starting from the hip to the foot, several options are possible, then the
software will submit them to the user to choose.
Sincerely,
Delphi_JB
Original comment by camera.d...@gmail.com
on 31 May 2011 at 8:50
Nice idea, but position possibility determination algorithm should handle
situations like this (watch attachment)
Original comment by root.ta...@gmail.com
on 29 Aug 2011 at 4:59
Attachments:
Yes indeed, perhaps more should be a check options such as:
contortionist:
* Yes * No
The algorithm would have a lower tolerance of some movement, such as the
curvature of the spine.
I discussed this idea with other colleagues in computer graphics, specializing,
as I am, in 3D, and all very promptly said it was a good idea, we should use it
... ^ ^
Original comment by camera.d...@gmail.com
on 29 Aug 2011 at 5:29
I think it's a good and innovative idea, also.
It's frustrating for me to see it and haven't enough resources to work on it. A
pose system like this require at least a coder dedicated to it only. If anyone
know someone that can help, please ask him. I'm available to discuss the
implementation.
Best,
Manuel
Original comment by mbasti...@gmail.com
on 29 Aug 2011 at 5:48
I will look to find someone but that will not be easy. I already asked the
person most qualified for this type of coding but it has its own projects...
Original comment by camera.d...@gmail.com
on 29 Aug 2011 at 7:50
Original comment by mflerack...@gmail.com
on 29 Dec 2011 at 1:08
Manuel, Is this still the sort of direction you'd like to head with the poses?
Is this a desired work flow: Image of human model(real or otherwise)used to
"set" the pose of the MH model?
Original comment by supu...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2012 at 6:16
Excuse me, I do not quite understand your question...
if it's for the head, I think the direction of it will be in a special feature,
may be in a second window with a zoom on It.
Original comment by camera.d...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2012 at 9:10
While we are not immediately following this approach, I can announce that we
are working on a static pose system.
Dynamic posing is also something you can expect in the future.
Original comment by jonas.ha...@gmail.com
on 14 Nov 2012 at 1:25
Moved: http://www.makehuman.org/bugtracker/issues/86
Original comment by mbasti...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2014 at 8:34
Original comment by mbasti...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2014 at 8:34
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
camera.d...@gmail.com
on 30 May 2011 at 2:08Attachments: