Open morganpackard opened 11 years ago
Yeah, that sounds about right. But the name should probably be changed to just Panner
, which acts as a linear panner for mono signals and a linear balance for stereo signals. IMO that's what most people would probably expect.
If there's enough of a concern for backwards compatibility we can just make an empty public subclass as an alias of Panner
called MonoToStereoPanner
so things still work.
Personally I prefer other curves to linear, but we can add EqualPowerPanner
and StereoImagePanner
or whatever as they become necessary.
If there's enough of a concern for backwards compatibility we can just make an empty public subclass as an alias of Panner called MonoToStereoPanner so things still work.
Or a macro that redefines existing declarations:
#define MonoToStereoPanner Panner
Maybe just a naive, linear amplitude reduction in left and right, depending on pan value? Just a simple enhancement to MonoToStereoPanner to allow it to handle stereo signals? Any thoughts @ndonald2?