Closed daytonellwanger closed 2 years ago
This node-speaker
library code is licensed under MIT, and the dependency mpg123
is licensed under LGPL 2.1
Does that need to be documented in any way? Presumably anyone that uses this package is also bundling the mpg123
dependency. And I know that for me at least it wasn't clear that I was using LGPL 2.1 software, which could have ramifications for some uses.
Does that need to be documented in any way?
I don't know 😅
Maybe like this: #168
Maybe? Honestly I'm not sure either.
Merged that one ☺️
The license for the package is listed as MIT. But some of the code, e.g. here, specifies the LGPL license. What's the correct license for this package?