TorchEnsemble-Community / Ensemble-Pytorch

A unified ensemble framework for PyTorch to improve the performance and robustness of your deep learning model.
https://ensemble-pytorch.readthedocs.io
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
1.09k stars 95 forks source link

Adding the LBFGS optimizer from PyTorch #79

Open e-eight opened 3 years ago

e-eight commented 3 years ago

Hi,

I am trying to use the BaggingRegressor model, with shallow estimators, on a small dataset, for which the LBFGS optimizer usually gives good results with a single estimator. However I see that the LBFGS optimizer in PyTorch is not included in the accepted list of optimizers for torchensemble. Will it be possible to add the LBFGS optimizer to the accepted list of optimizers, or is there any way that I can use the LBFGS optimizer with torchensemble for my work?

Thanks

xuyxu commented 3 years ago

Hi @e-eight, thanks for reporting! Could you provide me with an example on how to use the LBFGS optimizer, for example:

for batch_idx, (data, target) in enumerate(dataloader):
    # Here is your code

According to this introduction, it looks like using the LBFGS optimizer is different from other optimizers.

e-eight commented 3 years ago

You can try it this way:

for batch_idx, (data, target) in enumerate(dataloader):

    # Code for sampling with replacement for bagging, or the corresponding code
    # for other models.

    # Optimization
    def closure():
        if torch.is_grad_enabled():
            optimizer.zero_grad()
        sampling_output = estimator(*sampling_data)
        loss = criterion(sampling_output, sampling_target)
        if loss.requires_grad:
            loss.backward()
        return loss

    optimizer.step(closure)

    # If you want to calculate the loss for monitoring:
    sampling_output = estimator(*sampling_data)
    loss = closure() # You can use this however it is preferred.

This way of optimizing should work with both LBFGS and other optimizers, such as Adam, at least it has worked for me with single estimators. You might find more details on the LBFGS optimizer here.

xuyxu commented 3 years ago

Thanks for your explanation. After reading the introduction, I think there should be no problem on supporting the LBFGS optimizer, wondering that if you are interested in working on this feature request ;-)

e-eight commented 3 years ago

Sure, I will be happy to work on it!! I will get started on it then, and comment here if I face any problems.

xuyxu commented 3 years ago

Glad to hear that 😄. Here are some instructions on what to do next:

Feel free to ask me anything in this issue or your pull request.

xuyxu commented 3 years ago

@all-contributors please add @e-eight for code

allcontributors[bot] commented 3 years ago

@xuyxu

I've put up a pull request to add @e-eight! :tada:

xuyxu commented 3 years ago

@e-eight it would be better to open a PR on your own.

e-eight commented 3 years ago

I have written the code, but I am not sure what is the best way to test it. I was thinking about doing the Year Prediction example in the examples folder, but with the LBFGS optimizer. Do you have any suggestions? Thanks!

xuyxu commented 3 years ago

Hi @e-eight, I am not sure if I understand your problem correctly. Perhaps you could open a pull request based on your current code, and we can then have a discussion there. For now, there is no need to pass all checks, simply upload your code, so that I can take a look and better understand your problem ;-)

e-eight commented 3 years ago

Added pull request #81.

xuyxu commented 3 years ago

Thanks @e-eight for your PR. Kind of busy in two days. I will get back to you soon.