Torsten2217 / google-plus-platform

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/google-plus-platform
0 stars 0 forks source link

Google Plus Button expandTo attribute doesn't work. #377

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Open http://mimming.com/plus/expandto.html or 
http://www.enjoy-swimming.com/test.html
2. Hover the mouse above one of the Google Plus buttons
3. The popup window opens

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

The popup should open in the direction specified in the expandTo attribute. 
Instead the popup opens in random directions.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

Tested on Windows XP with Internet Explorer 8, Firefox 14 & 15

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by therealc...@gmail.com on 28 Sep 2012 at 8:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by chirags@google.com on 28 Sep 2012 at 3:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I have the same problem here.

Win 7 on Explorer 8-9, FF 15, Chrome 22.0.1229.79

Original comment by vaillanc...@gmail.com on 30 Sep 2012 at 3:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This should now be resolved.

Original comment by pmlindner@gmail.com on 3 Oct 2012 at 6:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Confirmed working again.

Original comment by 4braham on 3 Oct 2012 at 6:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
No sorry still doesn't work on any of the test pages above

Original comment by therealc...@gmail.com on 4 Oct 2012 at 5:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
BTW doesn't work on Firefox 15.0.1 on Windows XP

Original comment by therealc...@gmail.com on 4 Oct 2012 at 6:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Make sure you clear your cache. I'm seeing it work fine on Fx 15.0.1.

Original comment by 4braham on 4 Oct 2012 at 5:47

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
4braham, we are both right and wrong :-). The bottom, right and left options 
work but not the top option, which is the one I need and use on my test page.

Original comment by therealc...@gmail.com on 4 Oct 2012 at 7:56

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
:( They are halfway there...

Original comment by 4braham on 5 Oct 2012 at 3:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Christophe,
Because there's not enough room for the bubble to properly expand above the g+ 
button it defaults to bottom.  If you copy the code from mimming.com and push 
the buttons down you will see the expandTo=top render as expected.

Original comment by lz1...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2012 at 6:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
No comment...

Original comment by therealc...@gmail.com on 9 Oct 2012 at 6:31

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I am trying to get it to go to the bottom, but it is stuck at TOP always. I 
have added data-expandTo="bottom" with no luck, and I have added white space to 
the bottom of my page. All with no luck.
<div class='g-plusone' data-expandTo='bottom' data-size='medium'></div>

Original comment by sll...@gmail.com on 30 Nov 2012 at 8:45

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by joannasm...@google.com on 3 Apr 2013 at 7:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Firefox 38.0.5 - It always expands to the bottom!

Using jquery -
$buildGooglePlusButtons = $('<a class="g-plusone" expandTo="top" 
data-size="medium" data-annotation="none">GooglePlus</a>');
On hover this is changed to a div (yes, I've checked!), copying the attributes 
over and replacing it in the DOM (yes, I said I'd checked - honest Firebug 
shows me!).

Works perfectly on Chrome Version 43.0.2357.124 m. - If you can call having a 
pug ugly enormous box pop-up onhover telling people the bloody obvious 
"perfect".

The CSS is all shitty as well, The tr's of the tbody within the div within the 
iframe are rendering transparent, but with some borders showing.
Get rid of the popup onhover, its functionally useless, so what's the point of 
causing this grief?

Original comment by HarryAl...@googlemail.com on 14 Jun 2015 at 4:28