Closed kosecki123 closed 10 months ago
@kosecki123 I think this is fine. We have no plans to ever change the TCO2 decimals, that would necessitate a thorough review of our protocol. Thanks for pinging, I'll note this down in our internal docs!
FWIW I agree with @0xmichalis here.
@0xmichalis our code implicitly assumes TCO2 decimal number is 18, this is needed as we using prb-math SD59x18 type, and covert amounts into it.
Is that ok assumption or would be recommend building decimal normalisation?