Closed gretel closed 5 months ago
Running on all push/pull_request events seems like a good idea. It doesn't seem to need the ref name to guarantee a unique filename though, since it already has the revision hash and run number. Is there a reason that field would be needed?
Running on all push/pull_request events seems like a good idea. It doesn't seem to need the ref name to guarantee a unique filename though, since it already has the revision hash and run number. Is there a reason that field would be needed?
it's not a requirement.. just useful for reference; the downloaded file(name) has some basic semantics to figure back on the action it was resulting from.
Not really sure it needs the ref name in the file name. It has pros and cons though:
So, closing for now unless there's a compelling reason to expand the filenames.