Closed njtierney closed 6 months ago
As part of the review in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6322
The License provided in DESCRIPTION is GPL-3
However LICENSE.md is MIT. Which license does the software use?
{gsMAMS} imports mvtnorm which is GPL-2 - usage of this software is copyleft, so requiring release under GPL, so MIT does not seem appropriate if the authors want to keep using {mvtnorm}
Thank you for pointing out the discrepancy! I will change the license to GPL-3.
As part of the review in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6322
The License provided in DESCRIPTION is GPL-3
However LICENSE.md is MIT. Which license does the software use?
{gsMAMS} imports mvtnorm which is GPL-2 - usage of this software is copyleft, so requiring release under GPL, so MIT does not seem appropriate if the authors want to keep using {mvtnorm}