Open aurora-1-2-3 opened 2 months ago
As great as this is it would be fairly difficult, I can think of a few ideas but it's not a priority for now
This is also fundamentally different from the vanilla model behaviour
Hm You can take your time as much as you want
But if people want to make a big pack with 3d armor and cit of that armor Yeah that's gonna push the performance really hard
Since the 3d armor feature you can Just add another set named Player_diamond_armor_layer_1.jem Or smth And for the mobs you can do the same Zombie_iron_armor_layer_1.jem Or Smth Instead of redoing the whole feature Add a player armor model And separate armor set with a model If that makes sense
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. The 3d armor feature is great but it's confusing Ex. If you are making a 3d armor RP, you will be confused with "modname_armor..."
Describe the solution you'd like Instead of making the 3d armor to be zombiearmor... Or smth You should make it easier Like make it diamond_armor... Smth iron_armor.... smth And for cit wizard_armor...smth enchanter_armor...smth.
Does OptiFine do this No optifine refuse to add this