Port to Forge 1.18.2

[CanadianBaconBoi]

Ported this to forge 1.18.2 using Architectury loom.

Main change is not bundling cloth config as it is seen as better practice to keep them separated in Forge.

I would recommend creating a branch on the base repo called 'forge', I will change the PR branch when it is made.

Note. I had to remove the developer nametag easter egg as it caused issues with Applied Energistics

[maximumpower55]

Thing to note is that there are major changes to the whole mod in dev right now

[CanadianBaconBoi]

If you'd like I could port that branch, or would it be preferable to wait for it to become stable?

[maximumpower55]

If you'd like I could port that branch, or I could wait for it to become stable to port it.

You should wait for it to be in a stable state / release

[Traben-0]

for now it might be easiest to just port from main yeah, i've made a forge branch for you

[CanadianBaconBoi]

Thank you, I've changed the base branch.

[Traben-0]

the next release will have quite heavy reworks

[maximumpower55]

for now it might be easiest to just port from main yeah, i've made a forge branch for you

The branch should be named architectury imo. But forge is fine

[CanadianBaconBoi]

I think that an architectury branch would be better suited for a mod with a common codebase that can compile to forge, fabric, and quilt.

[Traben-0]

jsut made an Architectury one

[maximumpower55]

I think that an architectury branch would be better suited for a mod with a common codebase that can compile to forge, fabric, and quilt.

Oh you didn't port it to a common codebase? That would make more sense imo

[CanadianBaconBoi]

@Traben-0 I could setup the Architectury branch for common builds

[maximumpower55]

@Traben-0 I could setup the Architectury branch for common builds

I can help with porting it to a common codebase now that you have ported it to forge

[CanadianBaconBoi]

This was more of a quick port to forge from the existing codebase, it would make more sense for the dev branch to be developed for a common codebase as a design idea rather an afterthought though.

[Traben-0]

it's going to be ideal for the future to have the common codebase

[maximumpower55]

I would rather wait for anything more major to happen with this pr after the heavy reworks are in a stable state

[CanadianBaconBoi]

I would then refactor the dev branch with that design philosophy so there wouldn't have to be a seperate branch for a common codebase.

[Traben-0]

we can just have the seperate forge version for now then

[maximumpower55]

the next release will have quite heavy reworks

Aka #48