Closed cavacado closed 1 year ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 67f2ab1c4aa7ae70c1bdb1a30fb0fb4cf3069796 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/ndi-tradex-poc/deploys/6412b8bd68f4250008a35dc5 |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-1--ndi-tradex-poc.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.
Summary of my understanding looking at this pr:
Method 1 looks the easiest. There's "no governance" over data. We can be very flexible about what we want to define in identityVC
.
Method 2 strives to have some sort of governance, expecting at least embeddedVC
. We are free to use any other property say for our case, we need type
later to differentiate other "third-party identity providers". But since type
is a protected term in https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1
, we will be using a substitute term called kind
instead.
Method 3 obscurity magic allow us to use type
.
@simboonlong here u go