I am happy to use Transcrypt. It seems that the early developers were using Transcrypt for a small project with small number of source files. So, they had no problem with flat structure in target/ directory.
But, I am developing a pretty big project with many source files in complicated directory structure. So, during debugging time, choosing the source files from target/ directory is pretty stressful job . Moreover, I have to choose the source files again whenever I rerun. Web browsers reload all source files whenever reload most times (maybe when the source files are modified). I have to read and scroll from the top of a very long list of source files to choose to open every time I rerun. It takes a pretty amount of time when the number of source files is large.
I think that if target/ directory maintains the original source directory , this task choosing source files for debugging get easier. I hope that it is not complicated to change.
I am happy to use Transcrypt. It seems that the early developers were using Transcrypt for a small project with small number of source files. So, they had no problem with flat structure in target/ directory.
But, I am developing a pretty big project with many source files in complicated directory structure. So, during debugging time, choosing the source files from target/ directory is pretty stressful job . Moreover, I have to choose the source files again whenever I rerun. Web browsers reload all source files whenever reload most times (maybe when the source files are modified). I have to read and scroll from the top of a very long list of source files to choose to open every time I rerun. It takes a pretty amount of time when the number of source files is large.
I think that if target/ directory maintains the original source directory , this task choosing source files for debugging get easier. I hope that it is not complicated to change.
Thanks.