Open timodonnell opened 3 years ago
Hello Tim, I'm sorry to hear about the issue. There is actually an newer version of the tool which was released 10 months ago (1.3.5). For some reasons, it wasn't tagged as latest (it is now that i corrected it). Please let me know if the issue remains with the newest version.
Antoine
Thanks Antoine. I'm rerunning everything now with the new version, will let you know how it goes.
It's still running now, but I'm am noticing many invocations like this:
command line - /usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pulp/apis/../solverdir/cbc/linux/64/cbc /tmp/983e48dce38b481aba1a515cf2959a22-pulp.mps max ratio None allow None threads None presolve on strong None gomory on knapsack on probing on branch printingOptions all solution /tmp/983e48dce38b481aba1a515cf2959a22-pulp.sol (default strategy 1)
At line 2 NAME MODEL
At line 3 ROWS
At line 7 COLUMNS
At line 13 RHS
At line 16 BOUNDS
At line 18 ENDATA
Problem MODEL has 2 rows, 1 columns and 2 elements
Coin0008I MODEL read with 0 errors
String of None is illegal for double parameter ratioGap value remains 0
String of None is illegal for double parameter allowableGap value remains 0
String of None is illegal for integer parameter threads value remains 0
String of None is illegal for integer parameter strongBranching value remains 5
Option for gomoryCuts changed from ifmove to on
Option for knapsackCuts changed from ifmove to on
Continuous objective value is 11 - 0.00 seconds
Cgl0004I processed model has 0 rows, 0 columns (0 integer (0 of which binary)) and 0 elements
Cbc3007W No integer variables - nothing to do
Cuts at root node changed objective from -11 to -1.79769e+308
Probing was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds)
Gomory was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds)
Knapsack was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds)
Clique was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds)
MixedIntegerRounding2 was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds)
FlowCover was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds)
TwoMirCuts was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds)
Result - Optimal solution found
Objective value: 11.00000000
Enumerated nodes: 0
Total iterations: 0
Time (CPU seconds): 0.00
Time (Wallclock seconds): 0.00
Option for printingOptions changed from normal to all
Total time (CPU seconds): 0.00 (Wallclock seconds): 0.00
This looks suspect having the Nones in the command-line, and the zero iterations. I looked in the Snakefile but couldn't easily see where this is happening. Curious what step uses a knapsack solver?
Anyway, just mentioning in case you spot an issue. Will update when the run has completed.
I am running over a large number of samples (~400 paired end samples) and /dekupl/bin/joinCounts is exiting immediately with error code 139 (segfault). Have you hit this before? Any idea what might cause it or what a possible workaround would be?
This is on docker transipedia/dekupl-run:latest (d39c8cf...) - which I notice is 2 years old. Is there an updated docker image I should be using?
Many thanks - appreciate your work on this tool.
Tim