Closed RKO closed 1 year ago
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
Name | Status | Preview | Comments | Updated (UTC) |
---|---|---|---|---|
battlesim | ✅ Ready (Inspect) | Visit Preview | 💬 Add feedback | Jun 18, 2023 1:51pm |
A random target would work as implemented here if we were using a statistics-based approach (running loads of simulations), but not for the current probabilities-based approach (running just once but calculating the average result)
A random target would work as implemented here if we were using a statistics-based approach (running loads of simulations), but not for the current probabilities-based approach (running just once but calculating the average result)
That makes sense. I think the problem I am trying to solve, is that "enemy with lowest/highest hp" will spread damage equally and "enemy with highest AC/DPR" will focus on a single target until dead. In a real encounter, it's more unpredictable.
But thinking about it, this implementation will give roughly the same result at "enemy with highest hp", which is an even spread of damage... One of the cases where I wanted this, is when I have multiple enemies of the same type with a debuff ability. As they have the same condition, they will all cast it on the same target(s) at the same time, which is a waste and not what would happen in a real encounter. So the problem is that I want something that can make each monster act a little randomly, but without it being random... The best existing condition I have found is "when this creature is under 50% heath", because that is different for each monster, but that runs the risk of not triggering if the monster is killed in one round.
Hmm, that's a good point. Since we already have a clause that says buffs/debuffs don't stack, it might be a good idea to make it so if the target is already affected by that buff, it automatically chooses the next target.
Oh yeah, I actually convinced myself that it was not an option (was probably thinking about spell slots not being implemented). I can try doing that instead.
The default "enemy with lowest hp" assumes that the enemy (often players) will swap out who is in front and taking damage. In many scenarios, the battle is much more chaotic, so I added a random target option for both enemy and ally.