synctext
commented
7 months ago We deployed Network Buzz within Tribler in 2010. This is what Reddit had to say then about it: Nothing has changed as of today. Thanks to the "network buzz" feature (which you can't turn off) it almost never goes below 10% CPU utilization and sometimes just sits at 50% maxing out one of my 2 cores.
Related prior work is the tag systems since 2011, we lack the user community for this. MusicBrainz has volunteers with over 1 million edit/tagging contributions, that is our leading example.
Please do a 10-day prototype @drew2a. You now did top-down design exploration. Time for bottom-up "learn-by-doing". We do not know if "content bundling" can be done exclusive and perfect with local heuristics and zero database changes. Or we need to store, gather rich metadata and offer content enrichment plus database changes. What about the near-duplicates we studied for years (never could fix)?
Lets leave the anti-spam for future sprints :exclamation: No need to distract @grimadas from deployment and debugging the low-level rendezvous component. Only in 2025 we will re-visit the Justin Bieber is gay, tag spam problem.
drew2a
"Content Bundle" is a strategic feature in Tribler aimed at enhancing the organization and accessibility of digital content. It acts as an aggregation point for Content Items, bundling them together under a single, cohesive unit. This structure allows users to efficiently manage and access groups of related Content Items, simplifying navigation and retrieval. Ideal for categorizing content that shares common themes, attributes, or sources, the Content Bundle provides a streamlined way to handle complex sets of information, making it easier for users to find and interact with a rich array of content within the Tribler network.
The current representation of Content Items can be seen in the following picture:
We want them to have another layer of grouping:
Everything that we need already exists in our Knowledge Database, we can reuse the existing
CONTENT_ITEMas follows:Or another structure:
Or
So it's an open question regarding the structure. Please suggest your ideas.
To complete this task, we need to:
Related:
6214