brianjohnhaas
commented
5 years ago Yes, all correct.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:11 AM MichaelsGITIGIT notifications@github.com wrote:
You recommend the following tools/DBs for annotation of assembled transcriptome:
- BLAST using Swissprot
- hmmer3 using Pfam database
- SignalP
- tmhmm
- RNAMMER
Do I get it right, that only BLAST and hmmer results do have corresponding GO terms and hence have an influence on the later GO term enrichment analysis included in Trinity? I am asking this, because one could also assign GO terms for hits of RNAMMER, tmhmm etc. since this hints to a biological function. But I guess this is not implemented?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Trinotate/Trinotate.github.io/issues/11, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHMVXymcKsvvQO8zTngDV9QR-oqt1vnEks5uneA1gaJpZM4XzkIF .
--
Brian J. Haas The Broad Institute http://broadinstitute.org/~bhaas http://broad.mit.edu/~bhaas
You recommend the following tools/DBs for annotation of assembled transcriptome:
Do I get it right, that only BLAST and hmmer results do have corresponding GO terms and hence have an influence on the later GO term enrichment analysis included in Trinity? I am asking this, because one could also assign GO terms for hits of RNAMMER, tmhmm etc. since this hints to a biological function. But I guess this is not implemented?