Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Definition of attributes directly inside the definition of edges is not
supported.
use instead:
<att name="key" type="integer" value="1"/>
or is it a problem?
Original comment by xani...@gmail.com
on 6 Aug 2012 at 10:14
Yes, using an <att ... > is fine.
Just seems more natural for an attribute that is constant for the life of the
<node> or <edge> to be placed as an attribute.
not important.
Original comment by nworbn...@gmail.com
on 8 Aug 2012 at 1:24
I close the bug since that type of encoding will not be very compatible of how
the XGMML parser is implemented (the finite state machine requieres a single
attribute in each line)
Original comment by xani...@gmail.com
on 21 Aug 2012 at 3:03
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
nworbn...@gmail.com
on 1 Aug 2012 at 9:09