Closed exfizik closed 10 years ago
This looks quite complicated to be honest and I'm not sure if it fits the purpose of this library. If you find a solution I'd be happy to merge it, but it's unlikely I'll work on that myself.
I'm just wondering if the out of bounds check is really that necessary for this case. Unfortunately, I have little background in GIS so I can't justify my opinion... Maybe it's worth compare the numbers I get from Pyproj and utm and see if utm works for negative eastings without the out of bounds check.
that sounds like a good idea. please verify the results and then we can introduce an optional validate
parameter that disables the checks
@exfizik did you get any results yet?
Let me know if this becomes relevant again. I'll close this issue for now.
I ran into a problem when one of the points I need to use is outside the UTM zone I do other calculations in. http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/80680/negative-utm-easting
Is there any way your library could handle a case like this? Pyproj doesn't seem to have a problem with this. But I'd prefer a simple solution like this library. My calculations are quite primitive and having pyproj as a dependency feels like an overkill.