search

TurboWarp / extensions

User-contributed unsandboxed extension gallery for TurboWarp
https://extensions.turbowarp.org/
MIT License
107 stars 217 forks source link

New extension: Anthropic API #1475

Closed NotFenixio closed 1 month ago

NotFenixio commented 1 month ago

image You need an API key in order to use this extension.

AshimeeAlt commented 1 month ago

due to the fact that it does require an api key this probally wont be accepted, its the sad truth :(

NotFenixio commented 1 month ago

You can get $5 dollars in free credits. I don't think they ever expire too.

AshimeeAlt commented 1 month ago

You can get $5 dollars in free credits. I don't think they ever expire too.

still though, go through pulls that require api keys and i can bet they are either broken, rejected or some other form of a no.

NotFenixio commented 1 month ago

still though, go through pulls that require api keys and i can bet they are either broken, rejected or some other form of a no.

Well, there are exceptions. This one uses a prompt instead of a block which is more secure than asking through a block and risking leaking a key, has documentation on how to get one (and how to get the free credits) and is not broken. We'll see if it gets rejected.

(The only reason the workflow is failing is because of Prettier)

AshimeeAlt commented 1 month ago

still though, go through pulls that require api keys and i can bet they are either broken, rejected or some other form of a no.

Well, there are exceptions. This one uses a prompt instead of a block which is more secure than asking through a block and risking leaking a key, has documentation on how to get one (and how to get the free credits) and is not broken. We'll see if it gets rejected.

(The only reason the workflow is failing is because of Prettier)

still though, go through pulls that require api keys and i can bet they are either broken, rejected or some other form of a no.

Well, there are exceptions. This one uses a prompt instead of a block which is more secure than asking through a block and risking leaking a key, has documentation on how to get one (and how to get the free credits) and is not broken. We'll see if it gets rejected.

(The only reason the workflow is failing is because of Prettier)

still though, go through pulls that require api keys and i can bet they are either broken, rejected or some other form of a no.

Well, there are exceptions. This one uses a prompt instead of a block which is more secure than asking through a block and risking leaking a key, has documentation on how to get one (and how to get the free credits) and is not broken. We'll see if it gets rejected.

(The only reason the workflow is failing is because of Prettier)

just override the prompt function your using :| or get the class but we will see if it gets rejected, i just wanted to warn you do you dont have to ask why later

NotFenixio commented 1 month ago

This is probably better in some third-party gallery.