Closed yebai closed 2 years ago
It might be good to have a macro that prettifies custom adjoints in ReverseDiff for users.
Some users like to define their own adjoints.
It might be good to have a macro that prettifies custom adjoints in ReverseDiff for users.
That would be great!
@mohamed82008 It seems the new DistributionsAD release introduced some issues, see
[6] include_relative(::Module, ::String) at ./loading.jl:1044
[7] include at ./sysimg.jl:29 [inlined]
[8] include(::String) at /home/runner/.julia/packages/DistributionsAD/U9qRl/src/DistributionsAD.jl:1
[9] top-level scope at none:0
[10] include at ./boot.jl:317 [inlined]
[11] include_relative(::Module, ::String) at ./loading.jl:1044
[12] include(::Module, ::String) at ./sysimg.jl:29
[13] top-level scope at none:2
[14] eval at ./boot.jl:319 [inlined]
[15] eval(::Expr) at ./client.jl:393
[16] top-level scope at ./none:3
in expression starting at /home/runner/.julia/packages/DistributionsAD/U9qRl/src/reversediff.jl:392
in expression starting at /home/runner/.julia/packages/DistributionsAD/U9qRl/src/DistributionsAD.jl:55
ERROR: LoadError: Failed to precompile DistributionsAD [ced4e74d-a319-5a8a-b0ac-84af2272839c] to /home/runner/.julia/compiled/v1.0/DistributionsAD/mhHYG.ji.
https://github.com/TuringLang/Turing.jl/runs/524084297?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:251
Interesting. It's weird that I didn't get this error in DistributionsAD tests on Julia 1.0. I will fix it, it is simple enough.
I restarted the tests, seem to be fine now.
Are there any known issues that could prevent a switch? If not, maybe consider switching the default AD to ReverseDiff after https://github.com/TuringLang/DistributionsAD.jl/pull/44 is merged? Based on our benchmarks, ReverseDiff provides the most efficient reverse-mode AD implementation at the moment.