Closed ParadaCarleton closed 2 years ago
I have to say I have wondered about this as well. The Stan equivalent is rstanarm, "advanced regression modelling" if I'm not mistaken -- TuringAdvancedRegressionModelling?
What acronym or names do you guys suggest? TuringAdvancedRegressionModelling is huge.
JuTurArm? :laughing:
Seriously, I don't really have any perfect options myself. TuringARM would likely run afoul of the package naming guidelines. Maybe just TuringRegressionModels? Anyway, I don't want to strongly push anything here, it's really your choice.
TuringRegressionModels is a good name but also huge.
It should probably be short -- TuringGLM gets the point across moderately well, but I agree with Carlos that it falls short of the potential in here. TuringRegression is a good candidate IMO, could also suggest TuringClustering or other common modelling framework names.
Simple Modeling or Regression with Turing: SMORT
(Yes, I did fill this in as a backronym after thinking it would be funny to have a package named SMORT)
Simple Modeling or Regression with Turing: SMORT
(Yes, I did fill this in as a backronym after thinking it would be funny to have a package named SMORT)
Lol I appreciate the vigor but it's a downvote from me.
Understandable, have a nice day
We should either have a reference from a Julia ecosystem package (this is why I used the *GLM.jl
) or from Bayesian modeling in other languages (brms
or rstanarm
, but please no bambi
).
TuringGLM is being registered currently.
Might be worth it to give a broader name than TuringGLM in case we want to expand a bit past GLMs. For instance, being able to specify a generalized additive model where some components are estimated with a Gaussian process regression would be a very neat feature.