[Enhancement] Name "Requirements" field differently to avoid possible misinterpretation

Twentysix26 / x26-Cogs

General purpose cogs for Red V3

GNU General Public License v3.0

41 stars 29 forks source link

[Enhancement] Name "Requirements" field differently to avoid possible misinterpretation #4

Closed Jackenmen closed 3 years ago

Jackenmen commented 3 years ago

Cog

[ ] Defender
[x] Index
[ ] Sbansync

Describe the enhancement Similarly to https://github.com/Cog-Creators/Cog-Browser/issues/10, it might make sense to call the field differently to avoid users from misinterpreting it as something they need to handle manually.

Jackenmen commented 3 years ago

Welp, I should have used the "Feature request" template to get a more proper label I guess 😬

Twentysix26 commented 3 years ago

👍🏻 https://github.com/Twentysix26/x26-Cogs/commit/d9b38dfb2c6fb20c6d0ca8c8766907dee20ae6cf