Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
The screenshot which I forgot to attach
Original comment by jonas.thiem@gmail.com
on 4 Sep 2012 at 11:35
Attachments:
In fact I was confused, I thought the setting would affect the rotation of the
board at game start aswell - but it only affects rotation after each move in a
human vs human game.
So we need another option for rotating the board at game start towards the
human player I guess. Or alternatively, I have been thinking, wouldn't it make
sense to control both with this one? Probably, people would either like
rotation and then assumably would want it always (both at game start and after
a move in a human vs human game), or wouldn't like it like me and just would
want their board in standard rotation no matter who's playing.
Original comment by jonas.thiem@gmail.com
on 5 Sep 2012 at 8:52
If we settle for two options, what about this:
Make a new preference section, like "Animation" on the screenshot named "Board
auto-rotation", with those two options:
"Auto-rotate board to current human player at the start of the game"
"Auto-rotate board to current human player after every move in a two human
players game"
When the first is disabled, the latter should probably be implicitely disabled
aswell (both the setting and the checkbox to illustrate that).
My preferred setup is both disabled, btami seems to like first enabled, second
disabled, and I suppose some people like both enabled.
Original comment by jonas.thiem@gmail.com
on 5 Sep 2012 at 9:01
Original comment by gbtami
on 5 Sep 2012 at 9:04
Or what about naming them:
"Auto-rotate board to human player at the start of games with one local human
player"
"Auto-rotate board after every move in a game with two local human players"
Or is that too complicated? :-) (I added "local" to avoid confusion with FICS
games)
Well, maybe the second one shouldn't be dependant on the first being enabled
then, they seem to be for different game cases now as I think of it..
Original comment by jonas.thiem@gmail.com
on 5 Sep 2012 at 9:06
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jonas.thiem@gmail.com
on 4 Sep 2012 at 11:34Attachments: