Closed fuggla closed 5 years ago
I've never done licensing before. I'd be more than glad to formally declare it as open for modification/remixing/etc, I just figured it kind of was automatic considering the whole public repo thing. If you know how to properly do it (do I include some file in the repo for it, tag it to the top or end of the main file, put it in the README, etc?)
I'll gladly toss in a ## contributors section though, that shouldn't have slipped my mind. Thanks.
Rough draft of ## Contributors section is added in.
I only have minor experience with CC honestly, but I think it's a good idea. It's like a formal statement that this project is open for everyone. But it's not mandatory or anything.
I usually add something like this at the end of the file (depending on what licensed is used ofc):
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.
But imo just something like "licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 + link is good enough.
Added a license to the end. Thanks!
No problem, happy to help out where I can :)
The repository should be properly licensed with a LICENSE file: https://help.github.com/en/articles/licensing-a-repository
I recommend using the Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal license:
The Creative Commons CC0 Public Domain Dedication waives copyright interest in a work you've created and dedicates it to the world-wide public domain. Use CC0 to opt out of copyright entirely and ensure your work has the widest reach. As with the Unlicense and typical software licenses, CC0 disclaims warranties. CC0 is very similar to the Unlicense.
I've gone ahead and made a license file and moved the license into it. I'd rather stick with the license we have however.
This:
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made
Is important to me. I'm fine with people doing whatever they want, but for a lot of reasons I feel this is appropriate and the CC0 doesn't include that.
Now that this is turning in to a larger project which really encourages contributions (and hopefully something which continues to improve way beyond 2019!), should it be put under some kind of license? E.g. under cc-by-sa 4.0?
Perhaps a
## contributors
section as well? IMO always nice to see your name somewhere in projects, and I think others feel the same way :) and that would be a good place to add the authors of the old guides as well.