Closed clairelindsey closed 5 years ago
For computing the real-world size difference, I grabbed Roboto TTFs from Google Fonts, and Roboto-VF from its repo, and subset them all to Latin1. The size comparison isn't quite as hot as I was hoping:
Roboto-VF is the size of 7+ single styles. BUT the VF does include the slnt
axis, so it covers the Italic styles as well.
Also condensed
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 2:16 PM Chris Lewis notifications@github.com wrote:
For computing the real-world size difference, I grabbed Roboto TTFs from Google Fonts, and Roboto-VF from its repo, and subset them all to Latin1. The size comparison isn't quite as hot as I was hoping:
[image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/587009/49961556-d462ec80-fec7-11e8-93dd-401d880dd1bf.png
Roboto-VF is the size of 7+ single styles. BUT the VF does include the slnt axis, so it covers the Italic styles as well.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/TypeNetwork/variable-fonts-info-site/issues/17#issuecomment-447086686, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJfQ8ekonJQyF4mTEjK6JaJP31RdtOJ4ks5u4qeOgaJpZM4ZOFPP .
As far as I know, the more subsetting we do the less file saving there is/are.
On Dec 13, 2018, at 8:38 PM, Chris Lewis notifications@github.com wrote:
first draft https://variablefonts.typenetwork.com/examples/families/file-size-benefits
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Well, the full Roboto-VF.ttf is 3.4MB, which didn't seem like a great advertisement! Though it has a lot more glyphs than the standard Roboto TTFs downloaded from Google Fonts. So a secondary reason for the subsetting was to make sure everything was working from the same character set. I could try a larger subset if you think that would be a better example.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 4:15 AM David Berlow notifications@github.com wrote:
As far as I know, the more subsetting we do the less file saving there is/are.
On Dec 13, 2018, at 8:38 PM, Chris Lewis notifications@github.com wrote:
first draft https://variablefonts.typenetwork.com/examples/families/file-size-benefits
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/TypeNetwork/variable-fonts-info-site/issues/17#issuecomment-447307935, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAj1ARfsIIwrvLZ_dQOr4Ac2MI5MYlIWks5u45ZTgaJpZM4ZOFPP .
https://variablefonts.typenetwork.com/examples/families/file-size-benefits
@chrissam42 this is great! A few things re styling. Could you add the family names under the bars? Maybe something like this:
And if its not a total pain, could you give a little more leading for the list? Seems a tad tight to me.
Google Roboto VF And “single file” for existing family Show menu of instances of weights, widths and italics of a style and file size diff. via interactive pie chart, number of styles used vs download load
VF bar static and other grows as you select styles (from roboto classic)