Closed TypingCat closed 3 years ago
I brought 5 frames from issue #6 for a thought experiment: topology merging. This robot is passing through an intersection.
According to the first proposal, intuitive results can be obtained. This intersection is represented with 20 nodes.
According to the second proposal, the operation is minimized. This intersection is represented with only 6 nodes. However, there is some confusion when merging. Look at the central node that occurred in the 38 second frame. Each time a new topology is merged, a new leg grows. There were 5 legs at the end, but it should be 3 legs.
The first proposal was passed.
There was a debate on merging nodes of samples.
I wonder if the second proposal can be computed in real time.
Results of the test #13 shows the second proposal is robust and not that slow. Therefore the spatial structure will be represented by intersection nodes only.
There are 2 suggestions what the spatial structure represents. I think the first one is better.