yhan818
commented
2 years ago No worries.
I have already forked an instance and compiled /checked the Sphinx code. It is basically a documentation generator using predefined configuration / syntax. Over the weekend, I did a bunch of tests. I can show you how things work.
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 8:08 AM Fernando Rios @.***> wrote:
@.**** requested changes on this pull request.
I recommend doing a bit of research on how reStructuredText works (homework for me too)
In source/repos.rst https://github.com/UAL-RE/redata-docs/pull/19#discussion_r868120000:
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Repositories details +-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------+---------------+-------------------------------+-------------+---------------------------------------------+ | :ual-re:
ReBACH <ReBACH>| N/A | TBC |README|main| TBD | +-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------+---------------+-------------------------------+-------------+---------------------------------------------+ -| :ual-re:ReQUIAM <ReQUIAM>| |ReQUIAM_version| |CHANGELOG|README|master| N/A | +| :ual-re:ReQUIAM <ReQUIAM>| |ReQUIAM_version| |CHANGELOG| :rtd:RTD <requiam>|master| N/A |Won't this break the cross references? I'm not a reStructuredText expert but I think that that the order of the anonymous hyperlink targets matters. (i.e., the order of the references with the double underscore is now different since
READMEwas deleted. This may break the rest of the links following this change) Please test and verify— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/UAL-RE/redata-docs/pull/19#pullrequestreview-966309011, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCPLUPQSOCOCBCJHBA2AV3VJES75ANCNFSM5VJOKWXA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
zoidy
close Issue #16