Closed dwhieb closed 3 years ago
Notes:
;;
'.
- The definitions include cross-references in the data, e.g.
[see êkwa]
. These cross-references should be extracted into their own field in the database, but reintegrated for purposes of rendering in Itwêwina.
This should absolutely stay as a seperate field! So that definitions can reference other heads. Would DatabaseReference
be the correct type for this?
- Stem-internal morphological information is currently conflated into a single field, delimited by semicolons or some such. Parsing the stem-internal morphology would enable a derivational version of the analyzer.
YES! Let's maintain this as separate data in the database!
This should absolutely stay as a seperate field! So that definitions can reference other heads. Would DatabaseReference be the correct type for this?
Great! Most dictionary database software treats cross-references (see X) as a kind of lexical relation (along with synonyms, antonyms, etc.), so DaFoDiL does the same, using a DatabaseReference object: Lexeme/lexicalRelations/DatabaseReference
.
Closed by cda303578aa6d7cb3e308d51bc2875c199e7c53c.
Notes on this database have now been moved here: