Closed zuphilip closed 6 years ago
Looks good to me. Thank you.
Number "1" for a sole author is redundant, but harmless.
Okay. Thank you for testing. What do you think about the description for chapters, articles in conference proceedings etc.? Should we maybe in these cases skip the publicationTitle? Now, I would actually suggest to use the publicationTitle only for journalArticles, newspaperArticles and magazineArticles. Or do you see any benefit to make the description longer for the other cases?
These adds the series ordinal for the authors and a description as discussed in the corresponding issues.
Some testing and feedback would be fine now, @pigsonthewing, @nichtich.
For example the description can become quite detailed now, e.g.
LAST Den "conference paper from 'Ninth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 2007)' published in 2007"
, but maybe this is still fine. The numbers are always added now, also when there is only one author. What do you think?