The documentation is great. Plots and interpretations are clear, and easy to follow along.
Codes are readable and concise. Functions are written well with great docstrings.
Analysis and reasoning is correct and makes sense.
Communication is clear and concise with a smooth flow.
Suggestion: I only have a few minor suggestions. First suggestion is to maybe label the first "Results & Discussion" section as "EDA" and keep the second one as it is, instead of having two sections with the same title on your report. Also, the interpretation of Figure 3 describes four metrics: mean, median, 25% quartile and 75% quartile, but I am only seeing three metrics on the plot. Although the table of these metric can be found in the src folder, I would still suggest rephrase this part to avoid unnecessary confusion. Lastly, regarding the outliers excluded from training data, I am curious how they are defined so maybe you could briefly describe the rule used in defining an outlier (sorry if it is already defined in the project but I failed to find it).
Overall a great project! Hopefully my suggestions would help improve the project!
Hi Group32,
Well done on the project! I had fun reading it.
Overall a great project! Hopefully my suggestions would help improve the project!